liberal games

timesjoke

Progressive Killer
#1
I found this pretty funny:

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...-material-network-apologizes/?test=latestnews


Here we have a guy talking on a live basketball show who says about Sarah Palin; "Let me tell you something about Sarah Palin, she's good masturbation material".


I wonder what the reaction would be if a white man talking with other white men had spoken about a black woman that way? No, scratch that, I know what the reaction would be, they would crucify that white man and maybe even the other two who were standing there for not taking him to task right then on the air. Time and time again the far left of this Country behaves like spoiled brats and attack anyone with conservative leanings in some of the most vile ways but let a conservative say something half as bad and suddenly it is the end of the world.


This is all part of their bully tactics, they want to make it so nasty that good and decent conservative minded people don't want to hold public office because of their attacks.
 

hugo

Big Time BS'er
#2
I found this pretty funny:

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...-material-network-apologizes/?test=latestnews


Here we have a guy talking on a live basketball show who says about Sarah Palin; "Let me tell you something about Sarah Palin, she's good masturbation material".


I wonder what the reaction would be if a white man talking with other white men had spoken about a black woman that way? No, scratch that, I know what the reaction would be, they would crucify that white man and maybe even the other two who were standing there for not taking him to task right then on the air. Time and time again the far left of this Country behaves like spoiled brats and attack anyone with conservative leanings in some of the most vile ways but let a conservative say something half as bad and suddenly it is the end of the world.


This is all part of their bully tactics, they want to make it so nasty that good and decent conservative minded people don't want to hold public office because of their attacks.
One thing for sure no one will ever call Hillary masturbatory material.
 

timesjoke

Progressive Killer
#3
One thing for sure no one will ever call Hillary masturbatory material.
To be honest, I don't know off hand a single Progressive in power I would call attractive, at least not on the same level as the many attractive Conservative women in public office.




I still believe the majority of them can't stand that Sarah Palin has it all and they had to give up something big in their life to be in politics. Look at Hillary for example, she has lived in a loveless marriage just so she can fit into their Progressive world. She used Bill the best she could and still could not get elected President. She has no life, no real husband she can love, and is as you say, pretty darn ugly.



Palin is a beautiful woman even after several children when most women can't keep their figure past 4 months of their first pregnancy. Palin has very successfully stood up to the mostly hostile political system before the Progressive attack machine started going after her children and I understand why that would bother her, she never experienced just how dirty Progressives play in Alaska. But most of all, the biggest thing that I believe pisses these women and some men off is she is still married and in love with the father of her children.

Imagine that.



Is she a perfect politician? Hell no, Obama is a perfect politician, and if having perfection in public office means that, I will gladly look to someone who is not a practiced perfect politician.
 

timesjoke

Progressive Killer
#5
Lookinfg for someone who is a devoted capitalist myself.
In a perfect world I would too, but being as pefection is one of the things we can never truly attain, I will take what is humanly possible instead of shitting on someone who is at least human and 95% capitalist while at the same time not worshiping the communist beliefs.

Nobody is pefect, you have any idea how many times Newt coted to raise the debt ceiling and voted for other socialist programs and increases? Name any politician and I can offer examples of how they are not perfect.




Don't get me wrong, Palin would not be my first choice, but if her name ended up being called and it was a choice over her and a socialist like Obama, I would sing her praises and tell everyone I know how great she would be because it was internal bickering and backstabbing that gave 'Obama the easy win last time. Sure, he most likely would have won anyway, but the point is we made it easier because we refused to stand together. According to the polls, a massive numbner people wanted Hillary, not Obama, but those people mostly went out and voted for Obama, had they stayed at home nursing their bitterness Obama would have lost.
 

dude8799

Educated Commy
#6
Exactly thats all conservatives want to do is "nurse their bitterness". What school did Sarah Palin go to. Obama went to Harvard . Hillary Clinton went to Yale. Barack Obama has become rich from his best selling book "The Audacity of Hope" he is a capitalist in every form of the word. Where does it say if your a capitalist you cant help people get some health insurance. Its also in our constitution that the united states cannot become anything a free enterprise capitalistic society. Since when have liberals been the bullies. Sarah Palin put crosshairs on Giffords name on a map. She was shot multiple times possibly because of that. I think I've made my point.
 

eddo

I don't like you.
#7
Palin had nothing to do with Giffords getting shot, and it is flat out asinine to think that. Both Repubs and Dem's were shown to have had crosshairs on political maps for years.

How is Obama's Harvard degree helping out county now? How has it helped for the last couple years?

I'm not much for Sarah Palin anymore. She disappointed me when she stepped down as Governor of Alaska early, but I would pick a candidate that has experience running something long before I'd pick one with a big name college degree any day.
 

dude8799

Educated Commy
#8
Tell me what experience does Palin have being Gov of Alaska. Thats like the principal of a home school trying to get on the NYC Board of Education. And The recession started in 2004 not 2008 which means obviously the Bush tax cuts have done a lot of bad for the USA. The recession technically "ended" in 2009. While I think we still have work to do Barack has done a lot more for the country than Bush did. Obama doesnt have anything to work with right now. He inherited Trillions of dollars worth of debt. And TJ dont even talk about Progressive bullies when your title is Progressive Eater.
 

hugo

Big Time BS'er
#9
The fact is if we do not reverse our course down the pathway to a Greek style financial disaster Bush and Obama will go down in history as huge failures similar to the pre-Civil War Presidents. Arguing who is better, Bush or Obama, is akin to arguing who is cuter Rosie or Rosanne.

Fiscal irresponsibility should not be rewarded with a second term.
 

hugo

Big Time BS'er
#10
Thankfully, Obamacare will go down in flames when the USSC finds the requirement to purchase healthcare insurance unconstitutional.
 

hugo

Big Time BS'er
#11
Since when have liberals been the bullies. Sarah Palin put crosshairs on Giffords name on a map. She was shot multiple times possibly because of that. I think I've made my point.
What evidence do you have to suggest that the shooter had even seen the map? It is also possible that Giffords was shot because the shooter believed Giffords had killed Santa Claus.

Back on topic. Sarah has now been exposed as a total idiot. The Republican nomination is most likely a contest between Romney and Gingrich. Sarah and Snooki are getting together for a reality show.
 

dude8799

Educated Commy
#12
He was a known tea party supporter and they showed the map at a lot of tea party events. If I was ever going to vote republican than I would probably vote for Herman Cain. Who do you choose? And also what is your ideology Hugo? you seem to jump around to a different opinion on every subject.
 

hugo

Big Time BS'er
#13
I am basically the last Goldwater Republican. Ron Paul is closer to my viewpoints than any other Presidential candidate. I am a classical liberal (libertarian) who believes Jefferson stated it best "The government that governs best, governs least". This makes me liberal on social issues and conservative on fiscal issues using modern terminology. Right now I am more a deficit hawk than anything else. We will be in the same shape as Europe within 5 to 10 years if we don't agree to pay now for whatever we decide to spend.

On the Palin issue, someone who got owned by Katie Couric won't do real well in a debate. She'd make Perry look good.

I have never seen a credible source for the claim that the shooter ever had anything to do with the Tea Party. He seems to be just a plain nut with no strong political leanings
 

Rose

Active Member
#14
To think that Sarah Palin looks like the 30 Rock writer.. Tina Fey.

Tina Fey can actually impersonate Sarah Palin....

what a coincidence.. Just saying.
 

dude8799

Educated Commy
#15
And how about Michelle Bachman saying Ron Paul would legalize cocaine and heroin? Whats your opinion on the matter Hugo since you seem to have an opinion on everything ;)?
 

hugo

Big Time BS'er
#16
Ron Paul and I both agree with Mill's Principle.

J.S. Mill


The object of this Essay is to assert one very simple principle, as entitled to govern absolutely the dealings of society with the individual in the way of compulsion and control, whether the means used be physical force in the form of legal penalties, or the moral coercion of public opinion. That principle is, that the sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self-protection. That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant. He cannot rightfully be compelled to do or forbear because it will be better for him to do so, because it will make him happier, because, in the opinions of others, to do so would be wise, or even right. These are good reasons for remonstrating with him, or reasoning with him, or persuading him, or entreating him, but not for compelling him, or visiting him with any evil, in case he do otherwise. To justify that, the conduct from which it is desired to deter him must be calculated to produce evil to some one else. The only part of the conduct of any one, for which he is amenable to society, is that which concerns others. In the part which merely concerns himself, his independence is, of right, absolute. Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign.
The fact is federal drug laws are blatantly unconstitutional by any rational interpretation of the Constitution.
 

jokersarewild

Conservative/Liberal Beater
#17
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/debate/dwarcon1.htm
I would say that I disagree with a certain portion of the essay above (the link), simply because drugs like Meth can cause users to become violent when they come down. Other than that, though, the guy is spot on. Our govt. wasn't made to control the people, it was made to take care of certain things (roads, schools, etc), but not to control the citizenry. Totalitarian Regime, here we come!
 

hugo

Big Time BS'er
#18
Prohibition of alcohol required a constitutional amendment, prohibition of other drugs should have required the same procedure. The powers of the federal government, under the founders intent, were few and enumerated.
 

timesjoke

Progressive Killer
#19
Tell me what experience does Palin have being Gov of Alaska. Thats like the principal of a home school trying to get on the NYC Board of Education.
Actually Sarah had many, many years working her way up the system to bigger and bigger political office the same way Obama did, the only difference is Sarah Palin did it all on her own and earned everything she had in life while even the education you try to to tout for Obama was paid for by the Government, Obama is a product of free Government giveaways. No wonder why Obama will go down in history as the President who killed the most private sector jobs and at the same time increased the size and spending of Government the most.

And The recession started in 2004 not 2008 which means obviously the Bush tax cuts have done a lot of bad for the USA. The recession technically "ended" in 2009. While I think we still have work to do Barack has done a lot more for the country than Bush did. Obama doesnt have anything to work with right now. He inherited Trillions of dollars worth of debt.
Actually the economy died after the housing/banking collapse caused primarily by Fannie and frededie under orders from the Government to flood the economy with millions of irresponsible home loans. In 2004 the Republicans saw the collapse comming and tried to take at least some actions to stop Fannie and Freddie but the Liberals blocked the changes and kept running us off the cliff.


During the last part of the Bush Presidency we were under the control of a liberal Congress, Bush could make no policy or law on his own. Every law he signed was written and approved by Democrats.

During Obama's first 2 years of his Presidency he had something Bush never had, a super majority. Obama and his fellow Democrats could have made any law they wanted without a single vote from a Republican and what did Obama accomplish with this power? Nothing.

And TJ dont even talk about Progressive bullies when your title is Progressive Eater.
Um.....that is "Progressive Killer", but don't let accuracy get in the way of a good rant and flame, lol.

This is my title here on a debating forum, I rip Progressives apart with the facts while all they have are emotional outbursts and things they made up themselves to try and make their feelings sound reasonable. Obama spent more money with his first big bill the so called "stimulus package" Than 7 years of war in Iraq. All with one swipe of his pen and this was done with the promise that his package would keep unemployment below 8%. Remember that promise?






Anyway, back on topic:

My point was the way Progressives attack people like Sarah Palin and her family, if the Conservatives behaved the same way it would be the end of the world but Progressives see nothing wrong with these kinds of attacks on her or anyone else who does not believe what they belive.

Even here on this forum we cannot get 1 progressive to admit these kinds of comments are bad, why is it you progressives can't just dissagree with other people? Why must you turn to hate and nasty personal attacks? These are the Liberal games I speak on and all Liberals have this double standard. They cry if you even mention Obama's wife but feel Palin's children are fair game.


Again, I don't believe Palin is the best we have, but she is 100% better than Obama. If nothing else she would not have signed that stimulus package that did nothing for the economy and just ran us further into debt, she would not have signed the Obamacare bill that has forced healthcare insurance to increase more than 30% to most Americans.