>
>"Milton Lee"
>news:g6vnt3dp0sk3e9b7hbqro05t5a654e1umn@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:06:46 -0600, "Phil Abuster"
>>
>>
>>>
>>>"Capt. JG"
>>>news:13tmq9o3rkir1c2@corp.supernews.com...
>>>> Jere, it was going fine and probably will again, but who knows.
>>>> Certainly
>>>> Neal and his lovely crowd, a mixture of jack-offs, sockpuppets, and
>>>> criminals (literally) didn't help make it viable. The fact that Neal and
>>>> other rabble are liars and stalkers shouldn't be news to anyone.
>>>>
>>>> If you value this ng, you would be doing it a service to ignore him, as
>>>> I
>>>> try to do. I think Roger said it best that the optimal action is to
>>>> identify the socks early and ignore or plonk them.
>>>>
>>>
>>>It would seem to me if you really wanted to ignore him you would just
>>>ignore
>>>him rather than speak of him indirectly, always in unflattering terms. All
>>>you have done in your above paragraph is to cast who ever he is and his
>>>"associates" in a very negative light (the facts of which you probably
>>>can't
>>>prove) and just provoke "them" even more. Why do you tell others to ignore
>>>him, which they seem to do just fine, when you can't and you are always
>>>provoking him. It's my opinion that provoking him is much, much worse than
>>>dealing with him as an adult. Most people, when treated fairly, respond in
>>>kind. Why do you go to such lengths to makes things worse for everyone? In
>>>fact, you frequently speak ill of others especially if they question you
>>>or
>>>hold beliefs contrary to yours. It's your intolerance that is the poison,
>>>not the other person's view. Just look at you now, telling others what to
>>>do
>>>and how to behave while you do essentially the opposite. If anyone is to
>>>be
>>>ignored or plonked as a rule, it should be you. Your intolerance and
>>>hypocrisy is the real threat to this group as it has been to anyone or any
>>>other group you have ever dealt with during your life.
>>>
>>> I would like to point out to the readers that "Capt JG" is attempting to
>>>further ignite his battle against whomever here in this group by
>>>manipulating others into limiting their discourse to an exclusive group
>>>and
>>>by constantly banging the wardrum (and provocating) against a group of
>>>"individuals". You can reward this behavior by continuing to deal with him
>>>(possibly limiting it to the few times he isn't on a rant against someone)
>>>or just totally ignore him. It's unfortunate that it seems this is the
>>>only
>>>way he can draw attention to himself by constantly "volunteering" to be
>>>the
>>>victim, all to the detriment of the group. Toleration of his behavior has
>>>natural consequences which may not be congruent with the purpose of this
>>>group, so think and act wisely in your best interests. Thank you for your
>>>attention and thoughtful consideration.
>>>
>>>Respectfully,
>>>
>>>Phil
>>>
>>
>> You win the award for "Master of the Obvious". Anyone who has raised
>> children recognizes the immature motivations of Jon's behavior and
>> deals with him accordingly. It's the other children on the playground
>> I worry about, they aren't as obvious.
>>
>> Milton
>
>Immaturity combined with and reinforced by large overdoses of illegal
>recreational drugs in his formative years. What's left of his mind is
>definitely substandard. Even all those many years of psychoanalysis have
>failed to improve the situation. Jon borders on the edge of being totally
>dysfunctional in that he lives in a world all of his own - a world with
>little or no basis in reality. Have you noticed how so many of his
>statements amount to little more than a cry for help and reassurance that
>how and what he thinks is normal when it's anything but? Notice how he tries
>with all his heart and soul to fit in but remains an outcast? It would be
>sad if it weren't for the fact that he has nobody but himself to blame.
Houston, we have a problem.

















