>"Milton Lee" wrote in message >news:g6vnt3dp0sk3e9b7hbqro05t5a654e1umn@4ax.com... >>..." />

Just BS - The Ultimate Chat and Debate Forum: Re: Dead, officially dead - Just BS - The Ultimate Chat and Debate Forum

Jump to content

Welcome to Just BS - The Ultimate Chat and Debate Forum!

Just BS is a community for people to engage in intelligent conversations and debates with like minded individuals. If you to want to discuss politics or religion you'll find people that will join in on any political and religious discussions you start. So why not Join Today?

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Re: Dead, officially dead
Rate Topic: -----


#1 Kaditcha Woman

  • Group: Guests

Posted 15 March 2008 - 05:47 PM

On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:11:14 -0400, "Gregory Hall"
wrote:

>
>"Milton Lee" wrote in message
>news:g6vnt3dp0sk3e9b7hbqro05t5a654e1umn@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:06:46 -0600, "Phil Abuster"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Capt. JG" wrote in message
>>>news:13tmq9o3rkir1c2@corp.supernews.com...
>>>> Jere, it was going fine and probably will again, but who knows.
>>>> Certainly
>>>> Neal and his lovely crowd, a mixture of jack-offs, sockpuppets, and
>>>> criminals (literally) didn't help make it viable. The fact that Neal and
>>>> other rabble are liars and stalkers shouldn't be news to anyone.
>>>>
>>>> If you value this ng, you would be doing it a service to ignore him, as
>>>> I
>>>> try to do. I think Roger said it best that the optimal action is to
>>>> identify the socks early and ignore or plonk them.
>>>>
>>>
>>>It would seem to me if you really wanted to ignore him you would just
>>>ignore
>>>him rather than speak of him indirectly, always in unflattering terms. All
>>>you have done in your above paragraph is to cast who ever he is and his
>>>"associates" in a very negative light (the facts of which you probably
>>>can't
>>>prove) and just provoke "them" even more. Why do you tell others to ignore
>>>him, which they seem to do just fine, when you can't and you are always
>>>provoking him. It's my opinion that provoking him is much, much worse than
>>>dealing with him as an adult. Most people, when treated fairly, respond in
>>>kind. Why do you go to such lengths to makes things worse for everyone? In
>>>fact, you frequently speak ill of others especially if they question you
>>>or
>>>hold beliefs contrary to yours. It's your intolerance that is the poison,
>>>not the other person's view. Just look at you now, telling others what to
>>>do
>>>and how to behave while you do essentially the opposite. If anyone is to
>>>be
>>>ignored or plonked as a rule, it should be you. Your intolerance and
>>>hypocrisy is the real threat to this group as it has been to anyone or any
>>>other group you have ever dealt with during your life.
>>>
>>> I would like to point out to the readers that "Capt JG" is attempting to
>>>further ignite his battle against whomever here in this group by
>>>manipulating others into limiting their discourse to an exclusive group
>>>and
>>>by constantly banging the wardrum (and provocating) against a group of
>>>"individuals". You can reward this behavior by continuing to deal with him
>>>(possibly limiting it to the few times he isn't on a rant against someone)
>>>or just totally ignore him. It's unfortunate that it seems this is the
>>>only
>>>way he can draw attention to himself by constantly "volunteering" to be
>>>the
>>>victim, all to the detriment of the group. Toleration of his behavior has
>>>natural consequences which may not be congruent with the purpose of this
>>>group, so think and act wisely in your best interests. Thank you for your
>>>attention and thoughtful consideration.
>>>
>>>Respectfully,
>>>
>>>Phil
>>>

>>
>> You win the award for "Master of the Obvious". Anyone who has raised
>> children recognizes the immature motivations of Jon's behavior and
>> deals with him accordingly. It's the other children on the playground
>> I worry about, they aren't as obvious.
>>
>> Milton

>
>Immaturity combined with and reinforced by large overdoses of illegal
>recreational drugs in his formative years. What's left of his mind is
>definitely substandard. Even all those many years of psychoanalysis have
>failed to improve the situation. Jon borders on the edge of being totally
>dysfunctional in that he lives in a world all of his own - a world with
>little or no basis in reality. Have you noticed how so many of his
>statements amount to little more than a cry for help and reassurance that
>how and what he thinks is normal when it's anything but? Notice how he tries
>with all his heart and soul to fit in but remains an outcast? It would be
>sad if it weren't for the fact that he has nobody but himself to blame.



Houston, we have a problem.


0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


IPB Skins by Skinbox

Enter your sign in name and password


Sign in options
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with OpenID Log in with Windows Live   Or sign in with these services