Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
The real comparison is not between Mr. Obama's windfall profit tax and Mrs. Palin's risk-and-profit-sharing plan. It is between Alaska's constitutional rule -- that the people must share directly in the state's mineral wealth -- and Mr. McCain's proposal that coastal states should share in federal offshore oil revenue. His plan is for the funds to be used for public purposes like roads, schools and conservation. A share of royalties dramatically improves the coastal states' incentive to support drilling. But if Mr. McCain offered every individual American a royalty check too, he might find it easier to sell his program.

*NEVER FORGOTTEN*

 

Posted
Nice way to put a pretty face on a tax increase. Kill her.
I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. ? Will Rogers
Posted
God bless Sarah and may the nation follow your lead!http://justbs.us/public/style_emoticons/default/cool.gif

Obama is following her example. Has not socialized the nation's mineral wealth yet, but he is socializing healthcare and the auto industry.
I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. ? Will Rogers
Posted
Blod gess Sara!

Damn it, she is drunker than I am.
I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. ? Will Rogers
Posted
Damn it, she is drunker than I am.

Drinking in the morning is a new hobby of mine. Then it's off to the shops to buy some stripper boots for me and the girls...weeeee!
Posted
Drinking in the morning is a new hobby of mine. Then it's off to the shops to buy some stripper boots for me and the girls...weeeee!

Make sure to buy the girls edible panties.
I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. ? Will Rogers
Posted

Well snaf, it is like the point we made on this before and hugo dodged it, all the States use their National resources to help the public in one way or another. Texas gets a huge amount of money they steal from the oil companies, I posted a very long list of direct taxes the State imposes on the oil companies. That tax revinue is used to fund State functions, functions that each resident would have to pay himself if the State did not tax oil. At the same time Alaska pays way, way more for basic goods and services than people in Texas, so if we were to adjust the scale based on cost of goods, I would bet a considerable amount of money that the average Texan gets more out of the oil money then an average Alaskan resident. Sure, a Texas resident might not get a check, but they do get Government services and lower tax rates on their property etc.... because of the oil taxes, it all balances out.

 

Here in Florida we get tourists, we tax the piss out of them and let them go home while we enjoy the benefits of not having a State income tax.

Most if not all stereotypes hold some truth.

 

?The politicians don't just want your money. They want your soul. They want you to be worn down by taxes until you are dependent and helpless. When you subsidize poverty and failure, you get more of both.? ~ James Dale Davidson

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...