You cannot run something like this past a trained dog. They have a sense of smell surpassing most other animals. They can identify the smell of a corpse' date=' gun residue, drugs, blood etc. In order for us to understand what they have discovered they are trained to give a recognition signal for the thing they are trained to respond to.[/quote']BULL****!. These are animals that eat vomit and garbage and lick their own balls and assholes. I once had a drug dog run on my vehicle and show no hit. Despite the fact that all of the three occupants had in excess of a quarter ounce of marijuana on them, each, and we had not 3 minutes prior extinguished a joint that we had smoked to the nub. I would be willing to swear this on my child. Its true as true can be true.
I have witnessed their inadequacy first hand.
This case is bigger news over here. So just in case you don't know. UK police have found traces of blood and chunks of hair in the boot/trunk of a car/auto the McCanns hired 25 days after the child was allegedly abducted. The tissues are a good match- 90%, of the dead child. Not absolute, but pretty damn close.
None of this evidence has been publicly presented. It is not to be trusted. There are a number of reasonable explanations for this.
So, the evidence as it stands indicates that the parents moved the body somewhere while awaiting the heat to die down. Then they transported the body somewhere. Probably to a site which they believe can never be recovered from. Maybe weighed down in the sea, so the fish will pick the corpse clean and hence leave no evidence. They seem pretty sure that no body will be recovered
It would take approximately 200 pounds of attached weight to hold down a 50 pound corpse in water. The bacterial breakdown creates an excessive release of gas approximately 2-3 days after being dumped in ocean water. The gas will lift the body unless it has 3 times the bodies weight attached to it.Remember this if your wife ever crosses that line and needs a killin. A couple of cement blocks will do the trick not.
Tidal movements and currents would have to be accounted for, unless they got real f*cking lucky and just happened to choose a spot in a completely unfamiliar foreign land that was suitable to dump a body in the water and not have it come ashore, despite the weight attached to it.
Hugo said:
The fact is children are most often assaulted by someone they know. The parents are always suspect, until proven otherwise.
Motive is key. With any murder investigation the key element in either clearing or indicting a suspect is motive. There is NO MOTIVE for the parents. No psychological or psychiatric issues. No criminal history. No insurance motivation. Not so much as a whisper of sexual abuse charges. Nothing. No motive = not a suspect.
Parents do not leave their small children alone in a hotel room' date=' they just don't do that.[/quote']Did you type that as a joke or...........?
Parents do sh*t like this all the time. They leave their kids in the car while they pay for gas, only to realize their car and their child were stolen in a matter of minutes. Parents do things like this all the time thinking "Things like this don't happen to me". But they do.
As doctors, you can bet they know how to preserve a dead body, and yes, interesting they decided to vacation in a Country well known for not looking too harshly at rich vacationers for criminal acts.
Resort towns rarely treat their paying guests with disdain. Unless it's done as a means to encourage potential vacationers that there is no danger of a local person being an active child killer.
